|
|
|
Eco-friendly parking lot:
Fact sheet
|
|
| SUMMARY OF TECHNIQUES USED: Parking lot site (between Santa Cruz and Menlo Avenue at Crane Street, Menlo Park) |
|
| Technique |
Dimensions |
Total cost (a) |
Unit cost |
Average annual runoff reduction (b) |
| (1) Pervious concrete |
5,500 sq ft |
$55,000 |
$10/sq ft |
100,000 gallons (from asphalt replacement and adjacent asphalt and rooftop runoff) |
| (2) Biofilter |
1,400 sq ft |
$39,000 |
$27.86/sq ft |
185,000 gallons (from asphalt replacement and adjacent asphalt and rooftop runoff) |
| TOTAL |
|
$94,000 |
|
285,000 gallons |
Notes:
(a) Includes labor, materials, equipment rental, and dump fees.
Does not include cost of asphalt portions of the lot (~31,000 square feet).
(b) Based on estimated infiltration of at least 10 inches per year (average annual rainfall is 18 inches). Future monitoring data will refine this estimate.
| |
Figure 1. Site diagram (post-project) |
|
|
DETAILED INFORMATION BY TECHNIQUE
(1) Pervious concrete
| Material |
Dimensions, description |
| Pervious concrete |
5,500 sq. ft., 6” deep
|
| Permeable base |
3/4" crushed rock (ASTM #57), 6” deep
|
BENEFITS:
5,500 square feet of asphalt replaced, absorbs runoff from 5,800 square feet of asphalt and 6,100 square feet of rooftop. No ponding has been observed (storage capacity of concrete and base rock has not been exceeded) from 10/06 to 3/07. Measured infiltration rate of 38 inches/hour on 5/18/06.
ADDITIONAL NOTES:
Pervious concrete is essentially the same as conventional concrete minus the sand (coarse aggregate, cement, water, admixtures). It derives its strength (ranges from 500 – 4000 psi, with a typical value around 2500 psi) from its low water : cement ratio and is very sensitive to water content. Evaporation retardant and curing compound used during installation. There are several methods to finish the concrete surface including crossing rolling and use of a vibratory tamper on plywood. New surface finishing methods are being developed . Requires 7-10 days to cure.
LESSONS LEARNED:
Since use of pervious concrete is still relatively new in the Bay Area, it is critical that the project owner (a) be familiar with the product and know what a successful installation looks like, and (b) make use of existing resources in the design of the project. During the course of this project, Andy Youngs of the California Nevada Cement Promotion Council provided invaluable technical assistance. Also, several websites including http://www.perviouspavement.org/ and http://www.concreteresources.net/cd/ provide information on design, specifications, construction, and inspection of pervious concrete.
Parking Plaza #5 was renovated in two phases (see Figure 1) to avoid losing use of full lot at once. Phase 2 pervious concrete failed (surface aggregate detached on nearly entire area) and was removed and replaced. Possible factors in the poor curing of the failed section include: mix may have been too dry, ambient temperatures for Phase 2 installation (June 2006) were warmer than Phase 1 installation (November 2005), finished section may not have been covered with plastic quickly enough, plastic cover blew off of some sections during curing period. Also, a vibratory tamper was used to finish the surface of the second Phase 2 installation, compared to use of a roller for Phase 1 and the first Phase 2 installation. It was thought that the vibratory tamper produced a smoother, more intact surface than the roller did.
(2) Biofilters
| Material |
Dimensions, description
|
| Pervious concrete |
5,500 sq. ft., 6” deep
|
| Permeable base |
3/4" crushed rock (ASTM #57), 6” deep
|
BENEFITS:
1,400 square feet of asphalt replaced, absorbs runoff from 12,200 square feet of asphalt and 12,800 square feet of rooftop. Some amount of subsurface drainage from the pervious concrete may drain into the biofilters as well.
ADDITIONAL NOTES:
Runoff from the majority of the parking lot drains to the biofilters. The soil and sand filter pollutants out of the water as it seeps downward.
LESSONS LEARNED:
When water reaches the bottom of the gravel layer, it flows through the perforated drain to a drywell (see Figure 1). Because the drain pipe is located at the bottom of the gravel layer, all of the water flows out of the biofilter to the drywell. If the drain pipe were instead located at top of gravel layer, stored water could seep into the ground the entire length of the biofilter instead of just in the drywell.
The Phase 1 biofilter did not drain properly because soil and sand did not provide sufficient drainage. Overflow inlets that pipe surface water directly to the perforated pipe at the bottom of the boifilter were installed to eliminate ponding. The soil and sand specifications were revised for Phase 2 to ensure adequate drainage, and this biofilter drains properly.
(3) Asphalt:
The parking lot is just under one acre in total area. The remaining area (other than the pervious concrete and biofilters) is asphalt. Detailed information is not given for the asphalt because it is not a runoff reduction technique.
We gratefully acknowledge the City of Menlo Park for its willingness to use pervious concrete and its management of the construction of this project. |
|